Transcript Of The Video Recording - Can Not Be Profitable
Transcript Of The Video Recording - Can Not Be Profitable
If you plan to make a video recording for transcription of the first things you must consider is the reason for the video instead of audio. If you have other reasons for wanting to video - for example, to detect body language in a training session or meeting, or because you record TV or film clips, then you might consider transferring to audio before sending them to your transcriptionist. This article explains why.
If you plan to do a transcript of video recording, digital or analog, the first thing you need to consider is the reason for the video instead of audio. If you have other reasons for the video - for example, to record the body language of a training session or meeting, or because you're copying of TV or video material, so you should consider before sending the audio the transcriber. I am not aware of any transcriptional machinery that plays video, and there are a lot of time needed to transfer video tape to transcribe. If you have a video conference or in the target group to clean the author to better identify the speakers, you will need to carefully consider the best way to set the cameras or effort can go entirely to waste.
If you saved the video to help identify the person who transcribed the speakers, the transcript must be made first of audio tapes, and read while watching the video tape to verify that the speakers are properly identified. Since the video has no type transcription playback controls is again this time you consuming.If a video made by a group discussion, conference or round table, for example, please remember to give us a seating plan so that we can identify the various stakeholders of their positions in space. This may not always be 100% effective, as it depends on the location of the camera, but it will help. A customer sent us the video once and said, "Oh, you do not need a seating plan, everyone has a card in front of them.
One must also consider its position and writer - for example, as we are based in the UK, we only accept videos in the European Union (PAL) instead of the NTSC standard used in America.
"However, the video camera located at the corner of the room and looked over the shoulders of six of the twelve participants, which means that their bodies completely blocked the view of the placeholders. It also meant I can not say with 100% certainty that he spoke, and could only see the back of the participantsIt is important to understand that it takes about four hours to transcribe one hour of clear quality, good one to interview tapes and can take much longer if the quality is bad in any way. The additional time taken to record the audio from the video, then go back, you're probably in the order of 1 to 2 hours for each hour of video recording. So an hour of analog video recording can take five to seven hours for an interview and much more for a group session.
Other factors that increase the time as a strong accent, background noise or the need for transcribing word for word (see the differences on our web site word for word, word for word transcription intelligent and installation) will also increase the time clean. Digital recording is more affordable all the time, and has many advantages over analog tapes, so if you are making analog recordings to consider the transition to digital. Digital video has many of the same things as analog video, but is at least a record of better quality in almost all cases, may also be useful for making a video (analog or digital) for your purposes, for example, language graduates, digital audio recording, but at the same time, your transcriber.
Although you'll have to check through to make sure that the votes have been correctly identified, the cost of the transcript will be considerably less than if the transcriber must convert the audio and then a video.
Pictures/SnapShot :
If you plan to make a video recording for transcription of the first things you must consider is the reason for the video instead of audio. If you have other reasons for wanting to video - for example, to detect body language in a training session or meeting, or because you record TV or film clips, then you might consider transferring to audio before sending them to your transcriptionist. This article explains why.
If you plan to do a transcript of video recording, digital or analog, the first thing you need to consider is the reason for the video instead of audio. If you have other reasons for the video - for example, to record the body language of a training session or meeting, or because you're copying of TV or video material, so you should consider before sending the audio the transcriber. I am not aware of any transcriptional machinery that plays video, and there are a lot of time needed to transfer video tape to transcribe. If you have a video conference or in the target group to clean the author to better identify the speakers, you will need to carefully consider the best way to set the cameras or effort can go entirely to waste.
If you saved the video to help identify the person who transcribed the speakers, the transcript must be made first of audio tapes, and read while watching the video tape to verify that the speakers are properly identified. Since the video has no type transcription playback controls is again this time you consuming.If a video made by a group discussion, conference or round table, for example, please remember to give us a seating plan so that we can identify the various stakeholders of their positions in space. This may not always be 100% effective, as it depends on the location of the camera, but it will help. A customer sent us the video once and said, "Oh, you do not need a seating plan, everyone has a card in front of them.
One must also consider its position and writer - for example, as we are based in the UK, we only accept videos in the European Union (PAL) instead of the NTSC standard used in America.
"However, the video camera located at the corner of the room and looked over the shoulders of six of the twelve participants, which means that their bodies completely blocked the view of the placeholders. It also meant I can not say with 100% certainty that he spoke, and could only see the back of the participantsIt is important to understand that it takes about four hours to transcribe one hour of clear quality, good one to interview tapes and can take much longer if the quality is bad in any way. The additional time taken to record the audio from the video, then go back, you're probably in the order of 1 to 2 hours for each hour of video recording. So an hour of analog video recording can take five to seven hours for an interview and much more for a group session.
Other factors that increase the time as a strong accent, background noise or the need for transcribing word for word (see the differences on our web site word for word, word for word transcription intelligent and installation) will also increase the time clean. Digital recording is more affordable all the time, and has many advantages over analog tapes, so if you are making analog recordings to consider the transition to digital. Digital video has many of the same things as analog video, but is at least a record of better quality in almost all cases, may also be useful for making a video (analog or digital) for your purposes, for example, language graduates, digital audio recording, but at the same time, your transcriber.
Although you'll have to check through to make sure that the votes have been correctly identified, the cost of the transcript will be considerably less than if the transcriber must convert the audio and then a video.
Pictures/SnapShot :
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
Subscribe To
Posts
Comments
0 comments:
Post a Comment